SORRY
MR VICE PRESIDENT & MR/Ms GOVERNORS THE TAX PAYER CANNOT AFFORD YOU
VICE
PRESIDENT.
The
constitution framing members wanted to give us an ideal frame work of
governance and in their exuberance adopted the American model of vice president
and superimposed it on our parliamentary model of functioning.
The first
question that arises is ‘Do we really need a VP?’ In whatever way we may look
at the issue and try and apply whatever logic the answer would be a firm NO. As
per the constitution the Vice President (VP) is the ex-officio chairman of the
Rajya Sabha and officiates as the President when the later is away from office
for whatsoever reason, i.e. on tours, sickness, removal, resignation or death.
The Rajya Sabha can definitely elect its own chairperson just as other elected
bodies do. As regards officiating for the President temporarily, do we actually
need a Vice President in waiting to officiate for a symbolic head of state? The
constitution stipulates that in case the President is away the VP will
officiate and if he is also not available than the speaker of the Lok Sabha –
Chief Justice of India – followed by all Supreme Court judges in order of their
seniority will officiate as the President in case the need arises. Hence their
just does not appear to be any sanctity to the office of the Vice President.
The Vice
President is housed in a magnificent palatial bungalow and has a staff of 56
people (as per the official web site) to take care of his official and personal
requirements. The staff does not include the maintenance staff of the municipal
corporation, the security staff and other fringe staff who are there to ensure
that the VVIP is well cared for. In addition being the second citizen of India
he has personal planes to fly him around. On relinquishing office he will be
provided with support staff and an official residence at New Delhi and if he so
wishes another at his home town/ state capital besides the pension, medical
care, security cover for self and family, as also expenses borne by the tax
payer for travels within and out side the country etc for life for himself and
the family. The Vice President is an expensive person to have around and the
tax payer can well do without this august functionary who costs the tax-payer
crores of Rupees. As was concluded above the VP is definitely not required and
the office should be abolished.
GOVERNORS
There
are twenty nine Governors and seven Lieutenant Governors who perform purely
ceremonial functions and are the symbolic head of the states leading a lavish
life style at the poor tax payer’s expense. Each of these luminaries is housed
in palatial estates which cost a small fortune to maintain and keep them in
ship shape so that Their Excellencies are delighted with the surroundings. To
add to the woes of the tax payer the security environment demands that the
VVIPs are given extensive security cover for which at least one company (100
plus) of security personnel are deployed to guard the Raj Bhavans besides the
police force deployed on the roads leading to the Raj Bhavan . All that adds up
to a colossal amount of money being spent to keep the Governors in luxury and
unharmed. The plight of the tax payer does not end there. There is a sizeable
personnel staff to run the office and the house keeping besides expenses
incurred for tours/travels, medical and post retirement benefits which are all
paid for by the over burdened tax payer.
There is
no denying that in our parliamentary system there is a requirement of a titular
head of state at the State level just as the President is there at the national
level. The office of Governor has been trivialized by placing derelict
politicians in the regal Raj Bhavans. The Raj Bhavans are also playing host to
inconvenient politicians who need to be put away to pasture and are kicked
upstairs to the Raj Bhavans as also tainted and incompetent ministers who need
to be sidelined and kept away from public gaze temporally and in some cases
permanently. The Raj Bhavans are also the rewards for docile and submissive
bureaucrats and defense officers who have obediently toed the politician’s line
and are privy to the inside games that they play.
ZONAL
GOVERNORS
The tax payer is paying hundreds of crores to
keep these symbolic heads of States in office. Is there really a need to have
so many Governors? Why don’t we consider having Zonal Governors i.e. divide the country into four/five zones and
have one Governor for each zone? The zonal governor would be responsible for
over seeing the affairs of the states and union territories placed under
him/her. If and when the need arise for imposing President’s rule in any state
an administrator/s could be appointed for the purpose and they would report to
the Zonal Governor. This simple solution would save the tax payer thousands of
crores. Further Raj Bhavans rendered thus surplus can be leased out to the
hospitality business and lo and behold the tax payer’s burden on this account
would just disappear and in all probability generate a healthy surplus.
It is about
time that we examined the above proposal rationally and do away with the
wasteful expenditure ( not only for maintaining the surviving Governors but
also horde of retired luminaries who are enjoying lavish post retirement at the
tax payers expense. If we go in for just four/five Governors , with time the
number of retired governors the tax payer will have to maintain would reduce
drastically) that is just being incurred
to keep politicians of various shades happy at the poor tax payer’s expense.
The proposal is likely to be scuttled by using the often repeated excuse of
requiring constitutional amendment. The constitution has been amended well over
hundred times, two more amendments which will benefit the citizens no end would
be more than welcomed by the founding fathers and they definitely would not
turn in their graves. The tax payer’s burden would be reduced by thousands of
crores and the nation would more than welcome the rationalization. The powers
that be would do great service to the nation if they looked beyond their own
petty gains and instead gave a thought for the good of BHATAT MATA and the
hapless taxpayer i.e. the aam aadmi whom they have been fooling for over six
decades.
Surender
Singh
Well Said Sir.
ReplyDelete( http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/car-seva/470538/ )